<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iWeb Optimizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/</link>
	<description>Better Living Through Macintosh Scripting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Anderson</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-192966</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-192966</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I made a backup of my site that I wanted compress, but it did all my sites in iWeb that I don&#039;t have backups for! Be REALLY careful when using this software, actually, don&#039;t even use it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My websites are destroyed! Thanks a lot.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a backup of my site that I wanted compress, but it did all my sites in iWeb that I don&#8217;t have backups for! Be REALLY careful when using this software, actually, don&#8217;t even use it. </p>

<p>My websites are destroyed! Thanks a lot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emotpix</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-186513</link>
		<dc:creator>emotpix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-186513</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Wondering whether this works with iWeb &#039;09?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wondering whether this works with iWeb &#8217;09?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxx45</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-185190</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxx45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 23:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-185190</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right now, it&#039;s in an archive format. ,&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now, it&#8217;s in an archive format. ,</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riccardo</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-160260</link>
		<dc:creator>riccardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-160260</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Could be possible to have the option to filter by dimension (KB) the pngs to be converted in jpgs.
It would leave alle the graphics of the theme untouched and would reduce the size only of the big pictures
thanks!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could be possible to have the option to filter by dimension (KB) the pngs to be converted in jpgs.
It would leave alle the graphics of the theme untouched and would reduce the size only of the big pictures
thanks!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damoulianos</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-77620</link>
		<dc:creator>damoulianos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-77620</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think iweb optimizer works only with big images but not with small ones. I tried to convert my whole site and it was done from 5,5 MB to 8,9 MB.
So, I&#039;m manually applying iweb optimizer on my big images and it is quite a laborious task to do.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think iweb optimizer works only with big images but not with small ones. I tried to convert my whole site and it was done from 5,5 MB to 8,9 MB.
So, I&#8217;m manually applying iweb optimizer on my big images and it is quite a laborious task to do.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhett Maxwel</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhett Maxwel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wrote a simple automator action for iWeb that will accept images or movie files as input, and create a blog entry for each file.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The unique feature about this action is that it will optionally keep a count of entries based on the title.  So using this feature you could blog a couple of family photos, with entry names like &#039;family photo 1&#039;, &#039;family photo 2&#039;.  Then blog some work photos with entry names like &#039;work pic 1&#039;, &#039;work pic 2&#039;.  Then you could add some more family pics with names like &#039;family photo 3&#039;, &#039;family photo 4&#039;.  The automator plugin will remember the counts for you!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can get the action at &lt;a href=&quot;http://iwebblogger.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iWeb Blogger Action&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a simple automator action for iWeb that will accept images or movie files as input, and create a blog entry for each file.  </p>

<p>The unique feature about this action is that it will optionally keep a count of entries based on the title.  So using this feature you could blog a couple of family photos, with entry names like &#8216;family photo 1&#8242;, &#8216;family photo 2&#8242;.  Then blog some work photos with entry names like &#8216;work pic 1&#8242;, &#8216;work pic 2&#8242;.  Then you could add some more family pics with names like &#8216;family photo 3&#8242;, &#8216;family photo 4&#8242;.  The automator plugin will remember the counts for you!</p>

<p>You can get the action at <a href="http://iwebblogger.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">iWeb Blogger Action</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ka</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-2463</link>
		<dc:creator>Ka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-2463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am the (evil) builder of iweb optimiz(e&#124;o)r workflow&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This workflow has not been really appreciated by most people and I understand : &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because of iweb optimiz(e&#124;o)r workflow, sometimes (depends on the images) the website is heavyer than before and transparency is lost !&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am sorry if people have lost time with that tool, but let&#039;s look forward now : &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First point : I think iWeb Optimizor can be useful if the site is prepared for it. The images must be prepared to loose their transparency. For transparent images, i suggest to make a screen copy around them and to past this screen copy at the exact position where the transparent image  were. That way the background will be included within the new image and no more need for transparency (if somebody understand, please translate into correct english.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Second point : in my original submission to the present website, the description was a bit more complete than the one you can see above : &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;you will find below an extract of the original submission (no offense, just some more details) : &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;=========================================================&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;wish list :&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;iWeb is famous for producing heavy websites. Converting png images into jpg images is a good solution [04/25/2006 : hmmm, well, not always]. It is not the unique solution : iWeb generates multiple identical images in different folders. Regrouping those images in a unique folder could be done. It will be done maybe in a future release. I will appreciate help in this task.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;known bugs :&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-iWeb Optimizor does not make a backup copy of you png images
-jpg does not deal with transparency&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;History:
21 apr 2006 : 0.1b1 first release&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is the first release of a beta release...things can been done to improve it, I am sure (gif usage, intelligent choice of the target image format, regrouping of multiple identical images, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I think is that image optimization is the key to improve iWeb &quot;slowness&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The download figures (577 at the present time) and some comments on Apple iWeb forums proves that the need exists for a turbo engine for iWeb. If somebody wants to work with me on this project, it would be cool. I have ideas but really very little time to code them (and we are not bound to use only automator actions)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;VoilÃ , &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ka (k@weedolucidea.com)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>

<p>I am the (evil) builder of iweb optimiz(e|o)r workflow</p>

<p>This workflow has not been really appreciated by most people and I understand : </p>

<p>Because of iweb optimiz(e|o)r workflow, sometimes (depends on the images) the website is heavyer than before and transparency is lost !</p>

<p>I am sorry if people have lost time with that tool, but let&#8217;s look forward now : </p>

<p>First point : I think iWeb Optimizor can be useful if the site is prepared for it. The images must be prepared to loose their transparency. For transparent images, i suggest to make a screen copy around them and to past this screen copy at the exact position where the transparent image  were. That way the background will be included within the new image and no more need for transparency (if somebody understand, please translate into correct english.)</p>

<p>Second point : in my original submission to the present website, the description was a bit more complete than the one you can see above : </p>

<p>you will find below an extract of the original submission (no offense, just some more details) : </p>

<p>=========================================================</p>

<p>wish list :</p>

<p>iWeb is famous for producing heavy websites. Converting png images into jpg images is a good solution [04/25/2006 : hmmm, well, not always]. It is not the unique solution : iWeb generates multiple identical images in different folders. Regrouping those images in a unique folder could be done. It will be done maybe in a future release. I will appreciate help in this task.</p>

<p>known bugs :</p>

<p>-iWeb Optimizor does not make a backup copy of you png images
-jpg does not deal with transparency</p>

<p>History:
21 apr 2006 : 0.1b1 first release</p>

<p>It is the first release of a beta release&#8230;things can been done to improve it, I am sure (gif usage, intelligent choice of the target image format, regrouping of multiple identical images, etc.)</p>

<p>What I think is that image optimization is the key to improve iWeb &#8220;slowness&#8221;</p>

<p>The download figures (577 at the present time) and some comments on Apple iWeb forums proves that the need exists for a turbo engine for iWeb. If somebody wants to work with me on this project, it would be cool. I have ideas but really very little time to code them (and we are not bound to use only automator actions)</p>

<p>VoilÃ , </p>

<p>Ka (k@weedolucidea.com)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niels</title>
		<link>http://automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/comment-page-1/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>niels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 12:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automatorworld.com/archives/iweb-optimizer/#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The standard theme I use cannot be transformed into jpg. There is a lot of transparency used and png is necessary. If you use this tool the website becomes bigger (48mb to 62mb in my case) and really is messed up. This is not a solution for me...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The standard theme I use cannot be transformed into jpg. There is a lot of transparency used and png is necessary. If you use this tool the website becomes bigger (48mb to 62mb in my case) and really is messed up. This is not a solution for me&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

